EVENT>Trinity Lutheran Charity |SESSION>Friday Aft |SECTION> S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 25, 2025 |CLUB NO.>164087 | 04/27/2025 16:12
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Connie Stevens |RATING>Charity Club Championship |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 36.0 |TOP> 3 |MP LIMITS>None/1500/750 |CLUB>South Suburban Bridge Cen
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=2 ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Overall | Section | |Final |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Mary Kocevar Susan Stromberg B 2/3 2/3 . | 2/3 2/3 . 43.50 60.42 1.44(OA)
2 Larry Heidemann Louis Gaspardo B 1 1 . | 1 1 . 44.00 61.11 2.19(OA)
3 Geraldine Tyler Mary Veeneman C . . . | . . . 27.00 37.50
4 Constance Stevens Jerry Palm A . . . | . . . 26.50 36.81
5 Jacqueline Chavez Anna Urick B . . . | . . . 27.50 38.19
7 Anthony Veeneman Tim Branam C . . . | . . . 36.00 50.00
8 Don Cohen Joseph Chin A 4 . . | 4 . . 41.00 56.94 0.92(OA)
9 Trudi McKamey Charlotte Abernethy A . . . | . . . 35.00 48.61
10 Margery Hedegard Michael Adami B 2/3 2/3 . | 2/3 2/3 . 43.50 60.42 1.44(OA)
Totals 324.00
Results of Board 1Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 3.00 | 420 | 4♠ S 4 | | | 0.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 100 | 4♥ E -2 | | | 1.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 0.50 | | 4♠ S -1 | | 50 | 2.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 0.50 | | 4♠ S -1 | | 50 | 2.50 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
Results of Board 2Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 2.50 | 140 | 2♥ S 3 | | | 0.50 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 2.50 | 140 | 3♥ S 3 | | | 0.50 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 0.50 | | 4♥ S -1 | | 100 | 2.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 0.50 | | 4♥ S -1 | | 100 | 2.50 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
Results of Board 3Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
4 | Stevens-Palm | 2.00 | 100 | 1NT E -1 | | | 1.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 2.00 | 100 | 2♠ W -1 | | | 1.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 100 | 1NT E -1 | | | 1.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 0.00 | | 2♣ S -1 | | 50 | 3.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
Results of Board 4Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 2.50 | 100 | 3♠ W -1 | | | 0.50 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 2.50 | 100 | 3♠ W -1 | | | 0.50 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | | 2♠ W 2 | | 110 | 2.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 0.00 | | 2♠ W 3 | | 140 | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 5Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
8 | Cohen-Chin | 3.00 | 500 | 5♣x W -3 | | | 0.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 130 | 3♦ S 4 | | | 1.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | 100 | 5♣ W -2 | | | 2.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 0.00 | 50 | 3♣ W -1 | | | 3.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
Results of Board 6Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 3.00 | 90 | 1NT S 1 | | | 0.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | | 2♠ N -1 | | 50 | 1.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 0.50 | | 2♥ S -2 | | 100 | 2.50 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 0.50 | | 4♠ N -2 | | 100 | 2.50 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
Results of Board 7Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
8 | Cohen-Chin | 3.00 | 600 | 3NT N 3 | | | 0.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2.00 | 150 | 2NT N 3 | | | 1.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 0.50 | 100 | 2♥ W -1 | | | 2.50 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 0.50 | 100 | 2♥ E -1 | | | 2.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
Results of Board 8Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 3.00 | 50 | 3NT E -1 | | | 0.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 2.00 | | 1♠ W 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 1.00 | | 2NT E 3 | | 150 | 2.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 0.00 | | 3NT E 4 | | 430 | 3.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
Results of Board 9Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
8 | Cohen-Chin | 3.00 | 300 | 3NT E -3 | | | 0.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 100 | 2NT E -1 | | | 1.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 1.00 | | 2♠ W 3 | | 140 | 2.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 0.00 | | 2NT E 3 | | 150 | 3.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
Results of Board 10Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 1.50 | | 3NT W 4 | | 630 | 1.50 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 1.50 | | 3NT E 4 | | 630 | 1.50 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 1.50 | | 3NT W 4 | | 630 | 1.50 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 1.50 | | 3NT W 4 | | 630 | 1.50 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
Results of Board 11Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | 450 | 4♠ N 5 | | | 0.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 1.50 | 420 | 4♠ N 4 | | | 1.50 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 1.50 | 420 | 4♠ N 4 | | | 1.50 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 0.00 | 170 | 3♠ N 4 | | | 3.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
Results of Board 12Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3.00 | 90 | 2♦ S 2 | | | 0.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 2.00 | | 2♣ E 2 | | 90 | 1.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 1.00 | | 2♣ E 3 | | 110 | 2.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
9 | McKamey-Abernethy | 0.00 | | 1NT E 2 | | 120 | 3.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
Results of Board 13Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 3.00 | 200 | 2♥ W -2 | | | 0.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 2.00 | 130 | 3♦ N 4 | | | 1.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 1.00 | 120 | 1NT S 2 | | | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 0.00 | | 2♦ S -1 | | 100 | 3.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
Results of Board 14Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
8 | Cohen-Chin | 3.00 | 150 | 1NT S 3 | | | 0.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 130 | 2♦ N 4 | | | 1.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1.00 | 110 | 2♦ N 3 | | | 2.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 0.00 | 90 | 1NT S 1 | | | 3.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
Results of Board 15Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | 50 | 4♦ W -1 | | | 0.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1.00 | | 4♥ W 5 | | 450 | 2.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 1.00 | | 4♥ W 5 | | 450 | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 1.00 | | 4♥ W 5 | | 450 | 2.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
Results of Board 16Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 3.00 | | 2♠ W 4 | | 170 | 0.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | | 4♠ E 4 | | 620 | 1.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | | 3NT W 4 | | 630 | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 0.00 | | 4♠ E 5 | | 650 | 3.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
Results of Board 17Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | 150 | 1NT N 3 | | | 0.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2.00 | 120 | 1NT S 2 | | | 1.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | 90 | 2♦ N 2 | | | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 0.00 | | 3♦ N -2 | | 100 | 3.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
Results of Board 18Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2.50 | 110 | 2♥ N 2 | | | 0.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.50 | 110 | 2♥ S 2 | | | 0.50 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | | 1NT W 1 | | 90 | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 0.00 | | 3NT N -3 | | 300 | 3.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
Results of Board 19Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | | 3♠ W 4 | | 170 | 0.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 2.00 | | 1NT E 4 | | 180 | 1.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 1.00 | | 3NT E 4 | | 630 | 2.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 0.00 | | 4♠ E 5 | | 650 | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 20Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | | 1NT E 1 | | 90 | 0.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 2.00 | | 2NT E 2 | | 120 | 1.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 1.00 | | 3NT N -3 | | 300 | 2.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 0.00 | | 3NT E 3 | | 600 | 3.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
Results of Board 21Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
1 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 2.00 | 650 | 4♠ S 5 | | | 1.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 2.00 | 650 | 4♠ S 5 | | | 1.00 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 2 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 2.00 | 650 | 4♠ S 5 | | | 1.00 | Chavez-Urick | 5 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 0.00 | 100 | 3♥ W -2 | | | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 22Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 3.00 | 180 | 2NT S 4 | | | 0.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 2.00 | 140 | 2♠ N 3 | | | 1.00 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.00 | 110 | 2♠ N 2 | | | 2.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 0.00 | | 4♠ N -2 | | 100 | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 23Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
4 | Stevens-Palm | 2.50 | | 5♠ W 5 | | 650 | 0.50 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 2.50 | | 4♠ W 5 | | 650 | 0.50 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 0.50 | | 4♠ W 6 | | 680 | 2.50 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 0.50 | | 4♠ S 6 | | 680 | 2.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
Results of Board 24Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
2 | Heidemann-Gaspardo | 3.00 | 470 | 3♣x S 3 | | | 0.00 | Cohen-Chin | 8 |
4 | Stevens-Palm | 1.50 | 430 | 3NT S 4 | | | 1.50 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.50 | 430 | 3NT N 4 | | | 1.50 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
7 | Veeneman-Branam | 0.00 | | 4♣ S -1 | | 50 | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 25Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 3.00 | 400 | 4♠ E -4 | | | 0.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 2.00 | 300 | 4♠ E -3 | | | 1.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 1.00 | 170 | 2♥ S 4 | | | 2.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 0.00 | | 4♥ S -2 | | 100 | 3.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
Results of Board 26Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3.00 | 170 | 2♠ S 4 | | | 0.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 2.00 | 140 | 2♠ S 3 | | | 1.00 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 1.00 | 90 | 1NT S 1 | | | 2.00 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 0.00 | | 4♠ S -1 | | 100 | 3.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |
Results of Board 27Pair | North-South Names | MP | Score | Contract | Lead | Score | MP | East-West Names | Pair |
---|
3 | Tyler-Veeneman | 3.00 | | 4♥ N -2 | | 100 | 0.00 | McKamey-Abernethy | 9 |
5 | Chavez-Urick | 1.50 | | 3♠ E 3 | | 140 | 1.50 | Stevens-Palm | 4 |
10 | Hedegard-Adami | 1.50 | | 3♠ W 3 | | 140 | 1.50 | Veeneman-Branam | 7 |
8 | Cohen-Chin | 0.00 | | 3♠x W 4 | | 630 | 3.00 | Kocevar-Stromberg | 1 |